21st International Scientific Conference of Young Scientists Pages Modifications RSS Feed

Program Committee

UNWE — Fri, 04 Sep 2026 14:13:28 GMT

Prof. Rumen Brusarski, PhD – Chairman of the Programme Committee of the Conference, Dean of Finance and Accounting Faculty, UNWE, Sofia, Bulgaria

Prof. Krasimir Yordanov, PhD – Deputy Chairman of the Programme Committee of the Conference, Vice-Dean in Scientific and Research Activity of Finance and Accounting Faculty, UNWE, Sofia, Bulgaria

Prof. Serhii Harkusha, PhD – Rector of Poltava University of Economics and Trade (PUET), Poltava, Ukraine

Prof. Nataliia Pedchenko, PhD – First Vice-Rector of Poltava University of Economics and Trade (PUET), Poltava, Ukraine

Prof. Daniela Feschiyan, PhD – Head of Department „Accountancy and Analysis”, UNWE, Sofia, Bulgaria

Assoc. Prof. Gergana Mihaylova-Borisova, PhD – Head of Department „Finance”, UNWE, Sofia, Bulgaria

Assoc. Prof. Georgi Ranchev, PhD – Head of Department „Financial Control”, UNWE, Sofia, Bulgaria

Prof. Teodora Rupska, PhD – Chairperson of the General Assembly of Finance and Accounting Faculty, UNWE, Sofia, Bulgaria

Assoc. Prof. Atanas Georgiev, PhD – Dean of the Faculty of Economics and Business Administration at the Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski”, Sofia, Bulgaria

Prof. Vyara Kyurova, PhD – Vice-Rector for Educational Activities, South-West University "Neofit Rilski", Blagoevgrad, Bulgaria

Prof. Rayna Dimitrova, PhD – Dean of the Faculty of Economics, South-West University "Neofit Rilski", Blagoevgrad, Bulgaria

Prof. Reneta Dimitrova, PhD – Head of Department "Economics”, New Bulgarian University, Sofia, Bulgaria

Prof. Tatiana Hubenova-Delissivkova, PhD – Chairperson of the Management Board of the Union of Economists in Bulgaria, Sofia, Bulgaria

Kaloyan Stefanov – Chairman of the Student Council at the UNWE, Sofia, Bulgaria

Prof. Mario Pecaric, PhD – Professor in Faculty of Economics, Business and Tourism, University of Split, Split, Croatia, and Professor, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia

Prof. Helena Blazic, PhD – Professor in Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia

Andrej Ilievski, PhD – University American College Skopje, School of Business Economics and Management, Skopje, Republic of North Macedonia

Adj. Prof. Vanina Dangarska, PhD – Adjunct Professor in Department of Economics, Teaching Tutor Department of Management, University of Bologna, Italy - Alma Mater Studorium Universita di Bologna-Sede di Rimini, Bologna, Italy

Nikolina Vrcelj – Researcher, Scientific Conference Secretary of ERAZ Conference, Balkans JETSS Managing Editor, Executive Manager at the Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans (UdEkoM Balkan), Belgrade, Serbia

Invitation

UNWE — Fri, 28 Aug 2026 08:52:08 GMT

About the Conference

UNWE — Fri, 28 Aug 2026 08:51:10 GMT

XXI International Scientific Conference of Young Scientists

„THE ECONOMY OF BULGARIA AND THE EUROPEAN UNION: YEAR ONE OF THE ACCESSION OF THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA TO THE EURO AREA“

under the patronage of the Rector of UNWE Prof. Dr. Dimitar Dimitrov

University of National and World Economy (UNWE)

Finance and Accounting Faculty

November 5 - 6, 2026, UNWE, Sofia, Bulgaria

Dear Ladies and Gentlemen,

This year marks the 21th anniversary of the establishment of the INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE OF YOUNG SCIENTISTS “THE ECONOMY OF BULGARIA AND THE EUROPEAN UNION”, which is held under the patronage of the Rector of the University of National and World Economy (UNWE), Sofia, Prof. Dr. Dimitar Dimitrov.

On behalf of the Program and Organizing Committee of the conference, we have the honor and pleasure to invite you to participate in the XXI International Scientific Conference of Young Scientists "THE ECONOMY OF BULGARIA AND THE EUROPEAN UNION: YEAR ONE OF THE ACCESSION OF THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA TO THE EURO AREA", which will be held on November 5 - 6, 2026 at the UNWE, Sofia.

The conference is held by the Finance and Accounting Faculty of the UNWE in co-organization with the following national and foreign universities and organizations:

- Faculty of Economics and Business Administration of Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski”, Sofia, Bulgaria;
- University of Insurance and Finance (UIF), Sofia, Bulgaria;
- Faculty of Economics of South-West University “Neofit Rilski”, Blagoevgrad, Bulgaria;
- New Bulgarian University (NBU), Department of Economics, Sofia, Bulgaria;
- Union of Economists in Bulgaria, Sofia, Bulgaria;
- Student Council at UNWE, Sofia, Bulgaria;
- Association of Professors of Economics and Management in Industry, Sofia, Bulgaria;
- University of Bologna – Alma Mater Studiorum Universita di Bologna-Sede di Rimini, Bologna, Italy;
- University of Split, Faculty of Economics, Business and Tourism, Split, Croatia;
- University of Rijeka, Faculty of Economics and Business, Rijeka, Croatia;
- Poltava University of Economics and Trade, Poltava, Ukraine;
- Lutsk National Technical University, Lutsk, Ukraine;
- Ss. Cyril and Methodius University of Skopje, Skopje, Republic of North Macedonia.

The aim of the international conference is for young scientists – doctoral candidates, teachers, early stage researchers, as well as students, to present their scientific research to the academic community and discuss economic problems with Bulgarian and foreign scientists. This scientific forum is being held for the 20th time in a row, as the published scientific results from the previous scientific conferences prove the significant potential for the future professional development of young scientists. The format and organization of the scientific event are aimed at creating an academic atmosphere conducive to dialogue and exchange of ideas between the different levels of the academic community and business representatives.

The conference is also open to the participation of students (Bachelor and Master's degree), presenting their research interests and studies. Students participate in the sessions and discussions with prominent professors, scientists, policymakers and business representatives.

The conference is financed by a university scientific project for a scientific event under contract No. NID NF-1/2026/B.

THEMATIC AREAS OF THE CONFERENCE:

1. Financial policy, financial markets, banking, investments, insurance and social security;

2.. Accounting policy and practice, accounting standards, financial audit, control systems and internal control;

3. Research and science, research and development, science-business relationship, innovation, competitiveness, project management;

4. Entrepreneurship, management, marketing, corporate control and business development in Bulgaria, in the EU and globally.

Working languages of the conference:

Bulgarian;

English.

Conference venue: University of National and World Economy (UNWE), Sofia, Bulgaria.

Participation in the conference is in person at the UNWE, Sofia, in the Large and Small conference halls, and online via MS Teams eletronic platform.

We wish you a fruitful participation in the conference!

Prof. Rumen Brusarski, PhD

Chairman of the Conference Program Committee

Dean of Finance and Accounting Faculty

Prof. Dr. Silvia Trifonova, PhD

Chairwoman of the Conference Organizing Committee

Vice-Dean of Finance and Accounting Faculty

Invitation

UNWE — Fri, 28 Aug 2026 08:49:32 GMT

Editorial Board

UNWE — Tue, 25 Aug 2026 11:35:53 GMT

Prof. Rumen Brussarski, PhD – Finance and Accounting Faculty, UNWE, Sofia, Bulgaria

Prof. Silvia Trifonova, PhD – Finance and Accounting Faculty, UNWE, Sofia, Bulgaria

Prof. Krasimir Jordanov, PhD – Finance and Accounting Faculty, UNWE, Sofia, Bulgaria

Prof. Mario Pecaric, DSc – Faculty of Economics, Business and Tourism, University of Split, Split, Croatia, and Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia

Prof. Ljupcho Stojcheski, PhD – European University, Republic of North Macedonia, Dean of Faculty of Information Technologies, International University of Struga, Struga, Republic of North Macedonia

Prof. Yevhen Namliev, PhD – Higher School of Social and Economic in Przeworsk, Poland

Prof. Liudmyla Golovkova, DSc – Department of Finance, Accounting and Psychology, Ukranian State University of Science and Technology, Dnipro, Ukraine, Vice-Presindent of the Ukranian Scientific Diaspora in France, Paris, France

Prof. Oleksandr S. Balan, PhD – Odesa Polytechnic National University, Odesa, Ukraine

Assoc. Prof. Oleksandr. P. Krupskyi, PhD – Oles Honchar Dnipro National University, Dnipro, Ukraine

Prof. Lyudmyla Shymanovska-Dianych, PhD – Head of the Department of Management, Poltava University of Economics and Trade (PUET), Poltava, Ukraine

Prof. Elizabeta Tomevska-Ilievska, DSc - Ss. Cyril and Methodius University, Skopje, Republic of North Macedonia

Andrej Ilievski, PhD – University American College Skopje (UACS), School of Business Economics and Management, Skopje, Republic of North Macedonia

Prof. Bogomil Manov, PhD – Finance and Accounting Faculty, UNWE, Sofia, Bulgaria

Prof. Margarita Aleksandrova-Borisova, PhD – Finance and Accounting Faculty, UNWE, Sofia, Bulgaria

Prof. Snejana Bacheva, PhD – Finance and Accounting Faculty, UNWE, Sofia, Bulgaria

Prof. Roumiana Pozharevska, PhD – Finance and Accounting Faculty, UNWE, Sofia, Bulgaria

Prof. Todor Nedev, PhD – Finance and Accounting Faculty, UNWE, Sofia, Bulgaria

Assoc. Prof. Radostin Vazov, PhD – Faculty of Economics and Business Administration (FEBA), Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski”, Sofia, Bulgaria

Assoc. Prof. Ivan Todorov, PhD - Faculty of Economics, South-West University "Neofit Rilski", Blagoevgrad, Bulgaria

Assoc. Prof. Vladimir Tsenkov, PhD - Faculty of Economics, South-West University "Neofit Rilski", Blagoevgrad, Bulgaria

Assoc. Prof. Emil Kalchev, PhD - Department of Economics, New Bulgarian University (NBU), Sofia, Bulgaria

Assoc. Prof. Lena Rusenova, PhD – Finance and Accounting Faculty, UNWE, Sofia, Bulgaria

Assoc. Prof. Maria Markova, PhD – Finance and Accounting Faculty, UNWE, Sofia, Bulgaria

Assoc. Prof. Atanaska Filipova-Slancheva, PhD – Finance and Accounting Faculty, UNWE, Sofia, Bulgaria

Assoc. Prof. Lilyana Djoneva, PhD – Finance and Accounting Faculty, UNWE, Sofia, Bulgaria

Assoc. Prof. Tanya Vazova, PhD – “Paisii Hilendarski” University of Plovdiv, Plovdiv, Bulgaria

Chief Assist. Prof. Toma Donchev, PhD – Finance and Accounting Faculty, UNWE, Sofia, Bulgaria

Home

UNWE — Mon, 10 Aug 2026 08:14:29 GMT

21^st International Scientific Conference of Young Scientists

„THE ECONOMY OF BULGARIA AND THE EUROPEAN UNION: YEAR ONE OF THE ACCESSION OF THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA TO THE EURO AREA”

under the patronage of the Rector of UNWE Prof. Dr. Dimitar Dimitrov

University of National and World Economy (UNWE), Sofia, Bulgaria

Finance and Accounting Faculty

November 5 – 6, 2026, UNWE, Sofia, Bulgaria

Home

UNWE — Mon, 10 Aug 2026 08:13:45 GMT

20^th International Scientific Conference of Young Scientists

„THE ECONOMY OF BULGARIA AND THE EUROPEAN UNION:

20 YEARS SINCE THE SIGNING OF THE TREATY ON THE ACCESSION OF THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA TO THE EUROPEAN UNION AND MEMBERSHIP IN THE EURO AREA FROM 1.01.2026“

under the patronage of the Rector of UNWE Prof. Dr. Dimitar Dimitrov

University of National and World Economy (UNWE)

Finance and Accounting Faculty

November 6 - 7, 2025, UNWE, Sofia, Bulgaria

Contacts

UNWE — Sat, 08 Aug 2026 10:19:00 GMT

Chief Assist. Prof. Dr. Milena Kovachevich

Organizing Secretary of the Conference

Chief Assist. Prof. Dr. Yasen Daskalov

Organizing Secretary of the Conference

E-mail: mladiucheniconf@unwe.bg

Finance and Accounting Faculty

1700 Sofia, UNWE, Studentski District, "8 December Street", No. 19

Current information about the conference is published on the conference website:

https://young-scientists.unwe.bg/en

Conference Proceedings

UNWE — Sat, 08 Aug 2026 10:17:54 GMT

Download the Conference Proceedings of the 20th International Conference of Young Scientists „THE ECONOMY OF BULGARIA AND THE EUROPEAN UNION: 20 YEARS SINCE THE SIGNING OF THE TREATY ON THE ACCESSION OF THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA TO THE EUROPEAN UNION AND MEMBERSHIP IN THE EURO AREA FROM 1.01.2026”, published by UNWE Press:

Conference Proceedings, Part I:

https://young-scientists.unwe.bg/Uploads/Conference/%D0%A1%D0%B1%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BA%20%D1%81%20%D0%B4%D0%BE%D0%BA%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B4%D0%B8%20%D0%A7%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82%201.pdf

Conference Proceedings, Part II:

https://young-scientists.unwe.bg/Uploads/Conference/%D0%A1%D0%B1%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BA%20%D1%81%20%D0%B4%D0%BE%D0%BA%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B4%D0%B8%20%D0%A7%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82%202.pdf

The Conference Proceedings of the International Conference of Young Scientists is indexed in the Central and Eastern European Online Library (CEEOL):

Part I: https://www.ceeol.com/search/book-detail?id=1436902

Part II: https://www.ceeol.com/search/book-detail?id=1433582

It is included in the National Reference List (NRL) of contemporary Bulgarian peer-reviewed scientific publications, maintained by the Minister of Education and Science through the National Center for Information and Documentation (NACID).

https://nrs.nacid.bg/register/search

Author Guidelines

UNWE — Sat, 08 Aug 2026 10:16:05 GMT

The requirements for paper publishing in the Conference Proceedings of the XXI International Scientific Conference of Young Scientists „THE ECONOMY OF BULGARIA AND THE EUROPEAN UNION: YEAR ONE OF THE ACCESSION OF THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA TO THE EURO AREA“ reflect the principles set out in the "Code of Conduct, Guidelines and Good Practices of Editors of Publications" (COPE) and in the internal regulatory documents of the UNWE. The rules regulate the standards of ethical behavior of all participants in the publication process: authors, editors, reviewers and the University of National and World Economy as the publisher.

I. REQUIREMENTS FOR PUBLICATION

1. MANUSCRIPTS MUST NOT HAVE BEEN PUBLISHED IN OTHER PUBLICATIONS.

2. Authors must attach an AUTHORSHIP DECLARATION (according to the template). The template is listed on the conference website. This declaration certifies that the manuscript has not been published in other publications. The declaration, signed by the author and scanned, should be sent to the conference e-mail: mladiucheniconf@unwe.bg, together with the APPLICATION FOR PARTICIPATION (according to the template).

3. In case of a co-authorship – each author need to fill out and attach a CO-AUTHORSHIP DECLARATION (according to the template), indicating the participation of each author in the paper. The declaration, signed by each co-author and scanned, should be sent to the conference e-mail: mladiucheniconf@unwe.bg, together with the REGISTRATION FORM (according to the template).

4. The papers are submitted within the specified deadline to the conference e-mail: mladiucheniconf@unwe.bg.

5. The accepted papers, formatted according to the requirements - after reviewing process by the Editorial Committee of the conference, will be published in the Conference Proceedings in an electronic format with an ISBN number. The Conference Proceedings are included in the National Reference List of Contemporary Bulgarian Scientific Publications with Scientific Review of NACID.

6. In order for the Conference Proceedings to be published in the Central and Eastern European Online Library (CEEOL), each author should fill out a CEEOL DECLARATION (according to the template) and submit it to the Conference Organizing Committee.

7. Each participant with a paper will receive the Conference Proceedings in an electronic form.

8. The time for presenting and discussing one paper is 10 minutes.

9. Presentation of a paper at the conference need to be done with a Power Point presentation.

10. The author(s) present their paper in person at the conference.

II. FORMATTING REQUIREMENTS

1. Each paper should be written according to the PAPER TEMPLATE (attached below).

2. Maximum volume of the paper is 8 pages, incl. tables, figures (graphs and diagrams) and bibliography.

3. Papers can be written and presented in the working languages of the conference - Bulgarian and English.

4. Papers will be published in the language in which they are presented.

5. The first page of the paper should contain the following information:

Title of the paper - in Bulgarian

Name and surname of the author(s) - in Bulgarian

The academic degree, academic position, place of work, correspondence address and e-mail address of the author(s) should be given as a footnote for each author - in Bulgarian

Abstract (maximum 300 words) - in Bulgarian

Keywords (maximum 5 words) - in Bulgarian

JEL classification (at least one classification code)

Title of the paper - in English

Name and surname of the author(s) - in English

The academic degree, academic position, place of work, correspondence address and e-mail address of the author(s) should be given as a footnote.

Abstract (maximum 300 words) - in English

Keywords (maximum 5 words) - in English

JEL classification (at least one classification code)

4. Avoid abbreviations, diagrams (schemes) and references to the text in the abstract.

5. On the first page, the title of the paper, the names of the author(s), scientific degree and academic position, place of work, as well as the abstract and keywords for Bulgarian participants must be written in Bulgarian and English. For foreign participants - they must be written in English.

6. Papers are prepared in Word 2000 version or higher in A4 format (about 40 lines per page).

7. Recommended sequence for preparing papers:

Introduction

Discussion of the relevant literature

Methodology

Data and sources

Results from the study

Conclusion

References

8. Papers prepared in Bulgarian must contain one Abstract in the working language – up to 300 words, and one Abstract in English – up to 300 words.

9. Papers prepared in English must contain only an Abstract in English – up to 300 words.

10. The JEL classification can be found at the following link: https://www.aeaweb.org/econlit/jelCodes.php?view=jel

11. The following formatting requirements must be observed in the technical design of the papers:

Page margins: left – 2.5 cm, right – 2.5 cm, top – 2.5 cm, bottom – 2.5 cm.

Report text font: Times New Roman, 12 pt, normal.

Line spacing: 1.5.

Report title: Times New Roman, 14 pt, cap lock, bold, centered.

Page numbering: bottom, centered.

Name and surname of the author(s) (placed after one blank line after the title): Times New Roman, 12 pt, bold, centered.

Abstract (placed one blank line after the name and surname of the author(s)): Times New Roman font, 12 pt, italic, justified.

Keywords (placed one blank line after the abstract): Times New Roman font, 12 pt, italic, justified.

Subtitles: Times New Roman font, 12 pt, bold, centered.

Formulas should be centered and numbered on the right (1), (2),…

12. Graphs and tables

All graphs and diagrams should be labeled as figures and numbered consecutively with Arabic numerals. Titles should be placed below the figures.

Graphs and diagrams should not be placed in the text as photographs, but as editable images.
Tables should not be placed in the text as photographs, but as editable tables.

Tables should be numbered consecutively with Arabic numerals. Titles should be placed above the tables.

The source of the data in a table should be indicated below the table. Text in Bulgarian and English may be included in tables and figures – font Times New Roman, 10 pt, normal.

13. Citations

When citing publications by another author or authors in the text, the following rules should be followed:

Krugman at al., 1997; Born (1998) and Jones (2001); Barney (1991; 1994).

When citing publications by other authors in the text, the following rules should be followed.

When citing a specific text from another publication, the pages should be cited: Pavlov (2002, p. 333) claims that ". . . . . . ". Without citing a specific text, it is only: Pavlov (2002) confirms the thesis of the existence of a connection . . .

When the name of the author is not directly indicated in the text, it is placed in parentheses together with the year of publication: This problem has already been studied (Krugman et al., 1997).

When more than one author is mentioned in one sentence, they are cited: Smith (2000) and Born (2002) also prove that . . . .

In the case of more than one publication on the topic by a given author, the reference is: As suggested by Barney (1991; 1997) . . . or Studies in the 1990s (Barney, 1991; 1997) show that . . .

If several publications by the same author in the same year are used, a lowercase letter a, b, c, etc. is added after the year. Example: An earlier study by Porter (1990a) shows that . . . , but a later study by Porter (1990c) expands this statement with new aspects.

When citing secondary sources, the format is: A study by Brown (2000, cited in Smith, 2004, p. 120) shows that . . .

The bibliography should be listed after the main text, without numbering the literary sources.

Sources (publications, etc.) are arranged in alphabetical order of the authors' surnames - first in Cyrillic, then in Latin and other languages.

Under each cited source in Cyrillic - in Bulgarian, the same source, written according to the rules of the Transliteration Act, should be given.

Example:

Erhard, L. (1993). Blagodenstvie za vsichki. Sofia, UI "Stopanstvo".

(Erhard, L. (1993). Blagodenstvie za vsichki, Sofia, UI "Stopanstvo".)

The sequence of publications by one author is indicated by adding lowercase letters a, b, c, etc. after the year of publication.

14. Bibliography should be prepared as follows:

When compiling the list of cited sources, the following models (formats) should be used:

For books and monographs:

Porter, M. (1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York: The Free Press.

Post, J., Lawrence, A., Weber, J. (1999). Business and Society. 9th ed. Irwin/McGraw – Hill.

Georgiev, I. (1999). Fundamentals of Investment. Sofia: University Publishing House "Stopanstvo".

For articles and periodicals:

Farrell, J., Shapiro, C. (2008). How Strong Are Weak Patents? American Economic Review, 98(4), pp. 1347-1369.

Dinkov, D. (2011). Virtual Communities in the Postmodern World. Economic Alternatives, No. 4, pp. 3-18.

When citing an author from a collective publication:

Friedman, M. (1991). The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits, in J. Bower (ed.), The Craft of General Management. Boston: Harvard Business School Publications, 287-296.

For Internet/electronic sources:

If the source is a website, the information is arranged as follows: source, year, title of the web document or web page [means of access], available at: website address/URL[Date of last user access (for insurance)]

Example:

American Economic Association (2012). JEL Classification Codes Guide, [online] Available at: <http://www.aeaweb.org/jel/guide [Accessed 15 May 2012].

Hart, K. (1998) The place of the 1898 Cambridge, Anthropological Expedition to the Torres Straits (CAETS) in the history of British social anthropology. Science as Culture. [Online] 11 (1). Available: http://human-nature.com/science-as-culture/hart.html [Accessed 9 November 2003]

For unreferenced cases and sources, the Harvard citation system should be used.

Download Paper template in Bulgarian or in English:

Registration form

UNWE — Sat, 08 Aug 2026 10:15:36 GMT

Please, fill out the registration form: https://forms.cloud.microsoft/e/VazMqxJ7Bk

Fees

UNWE — Sat, 08 Aug 2026 10:15:00 GMT

CONFERENCE FEE

(FOR EXTERNAL PARTICIPANTS outside the UNWE and partner universities and organizations):

All participants from the UNWE and the partner universities and organizations are exempt from the fee for participation in the conference.

The conference fee for participants outside UNWE and partner universities and organizations is 100.00 (one hundred) EUR (including VAT).

The conference fee should be paid via a bank transfer to the UNWE’s bank account:

Bank: BNB

BIC of BNB: BNBGBGSD

IBAN: BG03BNBG96613100174601

Reason for the payment: “Fee for participation in the 21^th International Conference of Young Scientists”.

Content Relevance Policy

UNWE — Sat, 08 Aug 2026 10:14:11 GMT

1. Policy Objective

The scientific focus policy defines the thematic identity of the journal and ensures that the published materials have a consistent scientific orientation, a clear place in international scientific exchange and a sustainable contribution to the respective discipline.

2. Scientific scope

The journal publishes research that:

develops existing scientific knowledge;
proposes new theoretical or applied solutions;
uses scientifically sound methodologies;
has potential for international scientific communication.

3. Criteria for thematic relevance

Each manuscript is assessed against:

compliance with the subject area of ??the journal;
a clearly formulated scientific problem;
contribution to the existing literature;
presence of an international scientific context;
potential for impact on the development of the discipline.

4. Inadmissible content

Publications are not accepted that:

do not have a clearly expressed scientific contribution;
are only descriptive materials without analytical value;
are not related to the thematic profile of the publication;
contain unverified statements without scientific argumentation.

5. Strategic goal

Through this policy, the publication guarantees:

clear scientific positioning;
consistency of content;
international recognition;
sustainable development towards inclusion in international bibliographic and citation databases.

Annual Editorial Report

UNWE — Sat, 08 Aug 2026 10:13:40 GMT

Annual editorial report of the submitted papers for participation in the Conference Proceedings of the XX INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE OF YOUNG SCIENTISTS "THE ECONOMY OF BULGARIA AND THE EUROPEAN UNION: 20 YEARS SINCE THE SIGNING OF THE TREATY ON THE ACCESSION OF THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA TO THE EUROPEAN UNION AND MEMBERSHIP IN THE EUROZONE FROM 1.01.2026", 6-7. 11.2025, UNWE, Sofia, Bulgaria:

submitted papers - 162;
accepted - 112;
rejected - 50;
acceptance rate - 69%

Editorial and Review Policy

UNWE — Sat, 08 Aug 2026 10:13:06 GMT

The editorial policy for publishing scientific papers in Conference Proceedings of the XXI International Scientific Conference of Young Scientists „THE ECONOMY OF BULGARIA AND THE EUROPEAN UNION: YEAR ONE OF THE ACCESSION OF THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA TO THE EURO AREA“ reflects the principles set out in the "Code of Conduct, Guidelines and Good Practices of Editors of Publications" (COPE) and in the internal regulatory documents of the UNWE. The rules regulate the standards of ethical behavior of all participants in the publication process: authors, editors, reviewers and the University of National and World Economy as the publisher.

The editorial policy defines the principles, rules and procedures for accepting, reviewing, editing and publishing scientific papers in Conference Proceedings of the XXI International Scientific Conference of Young Scientists „THE ECONOMY OF BULGARIA AND THE EUROPEAN UNION: YEAR ONE OF THE ACCESSION OF THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA TO THE EURO AREA“.

The editorial policy aims to guarantee:

high scientific quality;
academic integrity;
transparency of the editorial process;
equality of all authors;
independence of editorial decisions;
compliance with international standards for scientific publishing.

The editorial process is based on the principles of scientific ethics, objectivity, impartiality and confidentiality. The publication provides free access to published scientific materials with the aim of maximum dissemination and use of scientific knowledge.

The editorial team carries out its activities in compliance with the following principles:

Scientific independence

Editorial decisions are based solely on the scientific value of the submitted manuscripts. Political, institutional, financial, religious or personal considerations do not influence the evaluation process.

Academic integrity

All participants in the publication process adhere to the principles of academic ethics. The following are not allowed:

plagiarism;
self-plagiarism;
manipulation of data;
fabrication of results;
misleading authorship.

Impartiality

All manuscripts are considered without discrimination in terms of:

nationality;
gender;
age;
institutional affiliation;
religion;
political views;
ethnicity.

Editorial independence

The editors make decisions independently of:

the conference organizers;
funding organizations;
the authors’ employers;
sponsors;
external stakeholders.

The editor bears full responsibility for the final decision on publication. The scientific content is determined by academic criteria, not by institutional, financial or organizational pressures.

The content of the proceedings is built on the principles of:

independence of editorial decisions;
separation between organizational and editorial activities;
protection of editors from external influence;
acceptance criteria based solely on scientific quality.

Confidentiality

All materials are treated as confidential. The editors:

do not provide information about manuscripts;
do not reveal the identity of reviewers;
use the information solely for editorial purposes.

Transparency

The editorial process is publicly described. The conference website publishes:

the editorial policy;
the peer review policy;
the publication ethics;
the requirements for authors;
the anti-plagiarism policy;
the corrections and withdrawal procedures.

RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE EDITORIAL TEAM

The editor-in-chief:

organizes the editorial process;
appoints reviewers;
monitors quality;
makes final decisions;
ensures compliance with ethical standards.

The editorial team:

assists the editor;
proposes reviewers;
evaluates the peer review policy;
participates with proposals for changes in the editorial policy.

CRITERIA FOR ACCEPTING PAPERS

Only manuscripts that:

contain original scientific research;
have not been published before;
are not simultaneously being considered by another publication;
correspond to the thematic scope;
contain a clear description of the methodology used;
include scientifically substantiated results;
contain up-to-date literature sources;
have successfully passed the double anonymous peer review procedure.

EDITORIAL PROCESS

The editorial process includes the following stages:

Sending the paper.
Checking for compliance with technical requirements.
Checking for plagiarism.
Appointment of two independent reviewers.
Receiving reviews.
Reflecting corrections (if necessary).
Re-reviewing.
Final decision.
Language editing.
Pre-press preparation.
Publication.

The editorial team stores:

the manuscripts/reports;
reviews;
declarations;
correspondence;
editorial decisions.

Documents are kept for a minimum of five years after publication. Authors are encouraged to provide access to the research data used, whenever possible and does not violate ethical or legal restrictions.

PEER REVIEW POLICY

The peer review policy aims to ensure the high scientific quality, originality and academic value of the publications included in the conference proceedings. The review process is independent, impartial, transparent and based on internationally recognized standards for scientific publishing. All submitted manuscripts undergo a double-blind peer review. In this model: the authors do not know who the reviewers are; the reviewers do not know the identity of the authors; the editors guarantee anonymity throughout the process.

This model reduces the risk of bias and ensures an objective assessment.

STAGES OF THE REVIEW PROCESS

Stage 1. Manuscript Submission

The author submits his/her report to the official conference email address – mladiucheniconf@unwe.bg. The editorial team checks: compliance with the thematic scope; compliance with technical requirements; presence of all necessary declarations.

Stage 2. Plagiarism Check

Each manuscript is checked with specialized software – Strike Plagiarism. If the percentages of: plagiarism; self-plagiarism; manipulated images; fabricated data are found to be above the permissible percentages, the report is rejected immediately.

Stage 3. Appointment of Reviewers

The Editor-in-Chief appoints two independent reviewers who:

possess scientific competence on the topic;
have no conflict of interest;
do not belong to the same institution as the author (when possible).

In case of conflicting reviews, a third reviewer may be appointed.

Stage 4. Independent evaluation

Each reviewer performs an independent evaluation, without contact with the author or the other reviewer.

Stage 5. Editorial decision

Possible decisions:

Accepted without corrections.
Accepted after minor corrections.
Accepted after substantial corrections.
Re-review required.
Rejected.

The final decision is made by the editor-in-chief.

EVALUATION CRITERIA

The reviewers evaluate:

1. Scientific originality

The research must offer a new scientific contribution.

2. Relevance

The topic should be significant for the development of economic science.

3. Methodology

The methods used must be: adequate; reliable; clearly described; reproducible.

4. Analysis

The results must be: logically analyzed; statistically justified (when applicable); supported by scientific arguments.

5. Conclusions

Conclusions must arise from the presented results.

6. Bibliography

The bibliography should:

be up-to-date;
include international sources;
contain scientific publications from recent years.

Reviewers fill in the evaluations according to the specified indicators in the Review Form.

ETHICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEWERS

Reviewers are obliged to:

maintain confidentiality;
evaluate impartially;
declare a conflict of interest;
refuse a review in the absence of competence;
report suspected violations of academic ethics.

DEADLINES

The approximate deadlines for making a decision on publication are as follows:

Initial review – up to 7 days.
Preparation of a review – up to 21 days.
Corrections by the author – up to 14 days.
Re-evaluation – up to 14 days.
Final decision – up to 7 days.

CONFIDENTIALITY

Reviewers may not:

use information from the manuscript;
copy parts of it;
distribute the content;
discuss the manuscript with third parties.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

A reviewer may not accept to be a reviewer if:

has been a co-author with the author in recent years;
works at the same institution;
has a financial interest;
there are personal relationships that may influence the evaluation.

REPEATING

In case of significant corrections, the report is sent again to the same reviewers.

REVIEWER SELECTION POLICY

Selection criteria:

academic degree;
publication activity;
expertise in the field;
independence;
international experience.

PUBLICATION ETHICS POLICY

This policy defines the ethical principles and standards that apply to the publication of scientific papers in the conference proceedings. The editorial team is guided by the internationally recognized principles of scientific integrity, transparency, objectivity and professional responsibility. All participants in the scientific publishing process – authors, editors and reviewers – are obliged to comply with this policy.

Editorial activity is based on the following principles:

academic integrity;
scientific objectivity;
independence of editorial decisions;
transparency confidentiality;
equality;
non-discrimination;
responsibility to the scientific community.

AUTHORS' RESPONSIBILITIES

The authors declare that:

the submitted article is an original scientific study;
the manuscript has not been published elsewhere;
the report is not being considered by another publication at the same time;
all co-authors have given their consent for publication;
the sources used are correctly cited;
the data are not manipulated, fabricated or falsified.

The authors bear full responsibility for the content of the publication.

AUTHORSHIP

An author is considered a person who has made a significant contribution to:

the development of the idea;
the collection or analysis of data;
the writing or editing of the manuscript;
the approval of the final version.

The following are not allowed:

fictitious authorship;
gifted authorship;
hidden authorship.

PLAGIARISM

The conference applies a zero-tolerance policy towards:

plagiarism;
self-plagiarism;
unauthorized use of other people's ideas;
unauthorized use of images, tables or figures;
manipulation of results.

All manuscripts are checked with specialized software – Strike Plagiarism. If a violation is detected, the editorial board may:

reject the manuscript;
notify the author;
if necessary, inform the relevant institution.

The Plagiarism Policy aims to guarantee the academic integrity, originality and reliability of published scientific materials. The publication does not allow the publication of texts that constitute plagiarism, unauthorized appropriation of scientific ideas, data, results, formulations or other intellectual products of other authors. The policy applies to all materials submitted for publication, including:

scientific reports;
review publications;
theoretical works;
methodological studies;
short scientific communications;
reviews and other editorial materials.

Plagiarism is considered to be:

using someone else's text, ideas, concepts, data or results without appropriate citation;
copying significant parts of publications by other authors;
self-plagiarism by republishing significant parts of one's own previous work without clear indication;
duplicate publication of the same scientific results in different publications;
presenting someone else's scientific work as one's own contribution;
manipulating citations in order to artificially increase scientific influence.

All submitted manuscripts are subject to verification for originality before the review procedure begins. The editorial board uses appropriate specialized systems to establish similarities between texts and available scientific publications. The results of the verification are evaluated by the editor-in-chief or a designated member of the editorial board. If plagiarism is detected, the editorial board may take the following actions:

refusal to consider the manuscript;
termination of the review procedure;
rejection of the article;
publication of a correction or withdrawal of already published material;
notification of the institution to which the author belongs, when necessary.

Authors bear full responsibility for the originality of the submitted materials and guarantee that:

all sources used are correctly cited;
the contributions of other researchers are clearly indicated;
the submitted text does not infringe copyright:
Artificial intelligence cannot be indicated as an author.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST POLICY

The publication strives to guarantee independence, transparency and impartiality at all stages of the editorial process. All persons involved in the preparation, evaluation and publication of scientific materials should declare potential conflicts of interest. Authors are required to declare all potential conflicts of interest, including:

financial relationships;
institutional affiliations;
professional or personal relationships;
other circumstances that may influence the interpretation of the results.

If a conflict exists, it must be clearly declared in the manuscript. Editors and reviewers also declare a conflict of interest and, if necessary, are removed from the relevant procedure. Editors do not participate in the evaluation of manuscripts when:

they have a personal or professional relationship with the authors;
they participated in the research;
they have a financial interest in the publication or rejection of the material.

Reviewers must refuse to evaluate when:

they know the authors personally and this may influence the independent evaluation;
they work in the same organization;
they have a competing, financial or other interest.

RESPONSIBILITIES OF EDITORS

Editors: evaluate manuscripts solely according to scientific criteria; guarantee impartiality; ensure confidentiality; prevent conflict of interest; monitor compliance with the ethical standards.

RESPONSIBILITIES OF REVIEWERS

Reviewers: perform an independent assessment; observe confidentiality; give reasoned recommendations; notify the editor in case of suspected violations of academic ethics; do not use the information from the manuscript for personal purposes.

CORRECTIONS AND WITHDRAWAL

If serious errors are identified after publication, the editorial board may: publish a correction; publish an editorial note; temporarily suspend access; withdraw the publication. The reasons may be: proven plagiarism; fabricated data; serious methodological errors; violations of publication ethics.

PROCEDURE IN CASE OF SUSPECTED VIOLATION

The editorial board: registers the signal; performs a preliminary check; requests a statement from the author; analyzes the evidence; makes a reasoned decision. If necessary, the relevant institutions are notified.

DOCUMENTATION STORAGE

All documents related to the publication process are stored in compliance with applicable legislation and the internal rules of the conference organizer.

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE POLICY

It is not allowed: generating scientific results without human control; presenting AI-generated text as a fully author's contribution; using AI to create fictitious sources; manipulating images, data or results. Authors must indicate the use of AI tools when this is of significant importance for the preparation of the manuscript. The declaration should include: the tool used; the purpose of the use; the extent of participation.

EDITORIAL GUIDELINES

Editors are responsible for:

the scientific quality of the publication;
transparency of the editorial process;
equal treatment of all authors;
adherence to ethical standards.

Editorial decisions must be based solely on the scientific value of the manuscript. Editors may not:

make decisions based on personal relationships;
prefer authors due to institutional affiliation;
allow political, financial or other external influences.

Editors guarantee confidentiality regarding: submitted manuscripts; the names of reviewers; communication with authors; the content of expert assessments. Editors take action in the event of: suspected plagiarism; data manipulation; falsification of authorship; unethical behavior. Where necessary, the procedures of international publication ethics organizations are followed.

REVIEWER GUIDELINES

Reviewing aims to support editorial decision-making and improve the quality of scientific publications. Reviewers assess:

scientific originality;
methodological correctness;
significance of results;
clarity of presentation;
compliance with the thematic profile of the publication.

The reviewer must:

provide an objective assessment;
avoid personal criticism of the author;
indicate specific arguments;
declare potential conflicts of interest.

Manuscripts are considered confidential documents. Reviewers are not allowed to:

share the manuscript;
use unpublished information;
discuss the material outside the editorial procedure.

The reviewer should assess:

topicality of the topic;
contribution to the scientific field;
quality of methodology;
correctness of the analysis;
adequacy of conclusions;
quality of bibliography.

CORRECTIONS, RETRACTS AND EXPRESSIONS OF CONCERN POLICY

Papers submitted by authors are allowed to be corrected by them in the event of:

technical errors;
omissions;
inaccuracies that do not change the main results.

Retraction Applies to: proven plagiarism; falsified data; serious methodological violations; duplicate publication.

Expression of Concern Used when: there is serious doubt about a publication or the investigation has not yet been completed.

COMPLAINTS AND APPEALS PROCEDURE

1. General Principles

The Conference Organizing Committee shall ensure a transparent, fair and impartial procedure for the consideration of complaints related to editorial decisions and the review process. All complaints shall be considered in compliance with the principles of academic ethics, confidentiality, independence of evaluation and absence of conflict of interest, in accordance with COPE good practices.

2. Right to appeal

The author has the right to file a reasoned complaint when he/she believes that:

significant procedural violations have been committed during the review;
there is a demonstrable conflict of interest;
the decision is based on factual errors or misinterpretation of the content of the manuscript;
have been violated in principles of objectivity, impartiality or academic ethics.

Complaints based solely on disagreement with the scientific judgment of the reviewers, without the presentation of substantiated arguments, will not be considered.

3. Filing an appeal

The appeal shall be submitted by e-mail to the Chairman of the Organizing Committee within 7 calendar days of receiving the notification of the editorial decision. The appeal must contain:

identification number and title of the report;
a specific description of the grounds for appeal;
evidence or arguments in support of the appeal;
a declaration that the information provided is true and complete.

4. Review of the appeal

Appeals are reviewed by the Appeals and Academic Ethics Committee appointed by the Organizing Committee. The members of the committee:

may not have participated in the initial editorial decision or review;
are required to declare the absence of a conflict of interest;
review all materials under conditions of complete confidentiality.

If necessary, the Commission may:

request opinions from the initial reviewers;
assign an independent additional review to one or more external experts;
request additional information from the author.

5. Deadlines

The Commission shall acknowledge receipt of the complaint within 5 working days. The final decision shall be made within 20 calendar days of receipt of the complaint. If additional independent review is necessary, the deadline may be extended, and the author shall be notified in a timely manner.

6. Possible decisions

After the review is completed, the Commission may decide:

confirmation of the initial editorial decision;
re-review by independent reviewers;
amendment of the initial decision and adoption of the report;
termination of the procedure when the complaint is inadmissible or unfounded.

All decisions shall be written motivated.

7. Finality of the decision

The decision of the Appeals and Academic Ethics Committee shall be final and shall not be subject to further appeal within the framework of the conference procedure.

8. Confidentiality

All documents, opinions and correspondence related to the appeals procedure shall be treated as confidential and shall be used solely for the purpose of considering the specific appeal. Personal data shall be processed in accordance with applicable legislation on the protection of personal data.

9. Compliance with ethical standards

The appeals and complaints procedure shall be implemented in accordance with the ethical principles of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and established international practices for scientific publishing, ensuring equality, transparency, academic integrity and independence of the evaluation process.

RESPONSIBILITIES OF EDITORS AND REVIEWERS

Editors are guided by the Editorial Board’s policy on compliance with legal requirements regarding the use of offensive language, copyright infringement, and plagiarism.
Each paper submitted for publication in the conference proceedings is subject to plagiarism checking with the StrikePlagiarism software.
Editorial Board members must evaluate manuscripts on their scientific content without regard to the race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, ethnicity, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.
Editorial Board members must not disclose any information about the submitted manuscript to anyone other than the authors, reviewers, and representatives of the publisher.
Editorial Board members must not disclose the content of unpublished materials accepted as manuscripts or use them for their own research without the written consent of the authors.
Reviewers should treat each manuscript received for review as a confidential document.
The reviewer should not disclose or discuss the contents of the manuscript with any other person unless authorized by the author(s).
Reviewers are required to notify the editors of any significant similarity or overlap between the submitted manuscript and other published work with which they are personally familiar.
Reviewers should keep confidential and not use for personal gain any information or ideas obtained during the review of the submitted manuscript.
Reviewers should not review manuscripts when there is a conflict of interest arising from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships they may have with any of the authors, companies, or institutions involved in scientific research.

PUBLISHER'S OBLIGATIONS

The Publisher may not participate in decisions made by the Editorial Board regarding the publication of individual reports.
The Publisher guarantees that advertising, reprinting or other commercial activity related to the publication will not have an impact on editorial decisions.
The Publisher facilitates communication with other journals and publishers when this is beneficial to the Editorial Board or reviewers.
Publishers collaborate with other prominent publishers and industry associations in the process of creating standards of good practice related to issues of publication ethics.

Important Dates

UNWE — Sat, 08 Aug 2026 10:11:58 GMT

15 October 2026

- Deadline for submitting REGISTRATION FORM to the conference email: https://forms.cloud.microsoft/e/VazMqxJ7Bk

5 November 2026

- Deadline for submitting CONFERENCE PAPER (according to the template and formatted according to the requirements) to the conference email:

mladiucheniconf@unwe.bg.

- Deadline for payment of the FEE FOR PARTICIPATION in the conference. Payment should be made by a bank transfer.

- Participants from the UNWE and other partner universities and organizations of the conference are exempt from paying a conference participation fee.

- The conference participation fee for participants outside the UNWE and partner universities and organizations is 100 EUR (one hundred EUR) (including VAT).

The conference fee should be paid via a bank transfer to the UNWE’s bank account:

Bank: BNB

BIC of BNB: BNBGBGSD

IBAN: BG03BNBG96613100174601

Reason for the payment: “Fee for participation in the 21th International Conference of Young Scientists”.

Organizing Committee

UNWE — Sat, 08 Aug 2026 10:10:30 GMT

Prof. Silvia Trifonova, PhD – Chairwoman of the Organizing Committee of the Conference, Deputy Dean on Quality and International Cooperation of the Faculty of Finance and Accounting at the UNWE, Sofia, Bulgaria

Prof. Hudz Tetiana, PhD – Director of the Educational and Scientific Centre for Training Highly Qualified Personnel of Poltava University of Economics and Trade, Poltava, Ukraine

Prof. Nadya Velinova-Sokolova, PhD – “Finance and Accounting” Department, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski”, Sofia, Bulgaria

Assoc. Prof. Radostin Vazov, PhD – “Statistics and Econometrics” Department, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski”, Sofia, Bulgaria

Assoc. Prof. Stoyan Tanchev, PhD - Head of “Finance and Accounting” Department, Faculty of Economics, South-West University "Neofit Rilski", Blagoevgrad, Bulgaria

Assoc. Prof. Elena Stavrova, PhD - “Finance and Accounting” Department, Faculty of Economics, South-West University "Neofit Rilski", Blagoevgrad, Bulgaria

Assoc. Prof. Tsvetelina Marinova, PhD - "Economics" Department, New Bulgarian University, Sofia, Bulgaria

Prof. Ljubomir Drakulevski, PhD – Dean of Faculty of Economics, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University of Skopje, Skopje, Republic of North Macedonia

Prof. Vesna Bucevska, PhD – Vice-Dean on Science and International Activity of the Faculty of Economics, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University of Skopje, Skopje, Republic of North Macedonia

Prof. Ljupcho Stojcheski, PhD – Professor of Economics, European University, Republic of North Macedonia, Dean of Faculty of Information Technologies, International University of Struga, Struga, Republic of North Macedonia

Nataliia Manzhura – Head of the Scientific and Organizational Department of Poltava University of Economics and Trade, Poltava, Ukraine

Prof. Presiana Nenkova, PhD – Department “Finance”, UNWE, Sofia, Bulgaria

Assoc. Prof. Atanaska Filipova-Slancheva, PhD – Department „Accountancy and Analysis“, UNWE, Sofia, Bulgaria

Assoc. Prof. Lilyana Djoneva, PhD – Department „Accountancy and Analysis“, UNWE, Sofia, Bulgaria

Assoc. Prof. Maria Markova, PhD – Department „Accountancy and Analysis“, UNWE, Sofia, Bulgaria

Assoc. Prof. Evgeni Raykov, PhD – Department “Finance”, UNWE, Sofia, Bulgaria

Chief Assist. Prof. Katerina Vojcheska-Nikodinoska, PhD – Department „Finance”, UNWE, Sofia, Bulgaria

Chief Assist. Prof. Nikolina Nikolova, PhD – Department „Accountancy and Analysis“, UNWE, Sofia, Bulgaria

Chief Assist. Prof. Rositsa Toncheva, PhD – Department „Finance”, UNWE, Sofia, Bulgaria

Chief Assist. Prof. Toma Donchev, PhD – Department „Financial Control”, UNWE, Sofia, Bulgaria

Chief Assist. Prof. Galya Taseva, PhD – Department „Finance”, UNWE, Sofia, Bulgaria

Chief Assist. Prof. Kremena Choutilova-Yochkolovska, PhD – Department „Finance”, UNWE, Sofia, Bulgaria

Chief Assist. Prof. Angel Angelov, PhD – Department „Finance”, UNWE, Sofia, Bulgaria

Chief Assist. Prof. Iavor Bachev, PhD – Department „Financial Control”, UNWE, Sofia, Bulgaria

Chief Assist. Prof. Margarita Ivanova, PhD - Department "International Economic Relations and Business", UNWE, Sofia, Bulgaria

Assist. Prof. Ivaylo Taskov, PhD – Department „Finance”, UNWE, Sofia, Bulgaria

Chief Assist. Prof. Valya Vasileva, PhD – Department „Finance”, UNWE, Sofia, Bulgaria

Emilia Stoimenova – Head of sector, Faculty of Finance and Accounting at the UNWE, Sofia, Bulgaria

Chief Assist. Prof. Milena Kovachevich, PhD – Organizing Secretary of the conference, Scientific Secretary of Department „Finance”, UNWE, Sofia, Bulgaria

Chief Assist. Prof. Yasen Daskalov, PhD – Organizing Secretary of the conference, Department “Accounting and Analysis”, UNWE, Sofia, Bulgaria

Co-authorship Declaration

UNWE — Fri, 07 Aug 2026 22:07:38 GMT

IMPORTANT:

Dear participants, please send your co-authorship declarations to the conference e-mail: mladiucheniconf@unwe.bg

CEEOL Declaration

UNWE — Fri, 07 Aug 2026 22:07:03 GMT

Authorship Declaration

UNWE — Fri, 07 Aug 2026 22:05:04 GMT

IMPORTANT:

Dear participants, please send your authorship declarations to the conference e-mail: mladiucheniconf@unwe.bg

Photos

UNWE — Fri, 17 Jul 2026 11:52:43 GMT

Program

UNWE — Fri, 17 Jul 2026 11:46:25 GMT

Seminar

UNWE — Fri, 13 Jun 2025 10:18:04 GMT

Scientific Seminar

UNWE — Tue, 18 Mar 2025 13:28:33 GMT

Scientific Seminar "Guidelines for Publishing in Authoritative Scientific Journals"

November 7, 2024

15:00 - 16:30

UNWE, Sofia, Large Conference Hall

NATIONAL PUBLISHING HOUSE FOR EDUCATION AND SCIENCE "AZ-BOOKS"

Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Bulgaria

Team:

Director:
Emil Spahiyski

Deputy Directors:
Stoyan Stoyanov
Ventsislav Genkov

Archive - 2019

UNWE — Mon, 05 Aug 2024 10:07:49 GMT

Archive - 2020

UNWE — Mon, 05 Aug 2024 10:07:35 GMT

Archive - 2022

UNWE — Mon, 05 Aug 2024 10:07:25 GMT

Archive - 2023

UNWE — Mon, 05 Aug 2024 10:06:46 GMT

Declaration on the protection of personal data

UNWE — Mon, 05 Aug 2024 10:05:46 GMT